

It requires knowledge on the area of interior habitat, on isolation/connectivity of habitat patches within other land use forms (agricultural areas, transport infrastructures or settlements), and on edges where areas of focal habitat(s) about modified ecosystems. Reporting on fragmentation is first of all about identifying a generic set of indices to measure landscape pattern and their changes, which could in a second step be customized for specific species and habitats particularly vulnerable to fragmentation. Thus, fragmentation is inherently neither good nor bad it is a matter of interpretation which is species and habitat specific. for foraging, breeding, migration and dispersal) but on the other hand, may prevent the spread of alien species, pests, predators and diseases. It constrains natural movements of species (e.g. Fragmentation results in habitat loss and degradation. Many of Europe’s habitats are highly fragmented and at risk of further fragmentation as a result of ongoing developments and land-use changes.

The GIS layers are available as OGC WMS/WFS and could be re-used within a ModelWeb context in the near future, then being of direct benefit to GEOSS and its underlying data sharing principles.
#Matlab plot in webmap software
Furthermore, a dedicated pattern web map viewer was developed using existing tools, free open source software and web standard technologies for data viewing and query from the European Forest Data Centre (EFDAC). A snap-shot of the European-wide data available on the status and trends of forest fragmentation over the 1990-2006 time period is shortly illustrated.

The indices were computed by using the European-wide 25m resolution forest map of year 2006 and the broad scale CORINE land cover multi-temporal data as inputs maps. The number of indices in each family can be reduced depending on user’s focus and semantics. A concise array-based mathematical formulation of the indices allows their unambiguous semantic description and easier implementation, thus contributing to share concise data-transformation models. A set of indices were derived and organized into five main families: two indices on general landscape composition, four on forest fragmentation pattern, four on forest morphological shapes with their respective edge interface mosaic context (four indices) and three indices on connectivity.
#Matlab plot in webmap download
The fragmentation of a focal ecosystem is conceptualized from a landscape pattern characterization based on three publically available landscape models (Morphological Spatial Pattern Application of the GUIDOS free download software, Landscape Mosaic Pattern, Conefor Sensinode free open source software) that were partly combined. This paper responds to the need for improved reporting and methodology reproducibility on forest fragmentation as underlined in the biodiversity policy context. Conceptual illustration of model-based maps to compute the index families for a focal class ‘forest’: (a) simplified input land cover map according to four classes of interest, (b) the morphological forest shape map (MORPH), (c) the mosaic forest fragmentation pattern map (MOSAIC), d) the forest interface map (Interface), e) the inter-patch connectivity based on (e) Euclidian distance and homogeneous matrix and (f) Least-cost path and matrix resistance.
